Opinion: Letters to the editor
September 10th, 2019 12:38 PM
Now that the Riverside Village Board has voted to allow a recreational marijuana store in town, they have some work to do. I personally am ambivalent about it, and to a greater extent I feel a bit hypocritical. I want legalized pot, I am not sure it is good for Riverside to allow sales of it.
President Sells indicated at the board meeting that the information has been public for several months, and that it is a vocal minority opposing it on emotional grounds and not using scientific arguments.
That is a little unfair, given how many of us grew up be taught that pot was a dangerous illicit drug. Just because it has been on the board agenda, and in articles in the RB Landmark, does not ensure that the public is fully informed.
With an issue as important as this, the public needs to be more informed. I did not know that the topic has been addressed by various committees and watching the board meeting last week was the first I heard that. Trustees Jisa and Peters were correct in saying that the board needs to do more to educate the community. A town hall meeting is a good idea, but may not be enough.
The work the board needs to do now is explain to the residents what the reality is going to be. They say the sales of legal recreational marijuana is highly regulated – what does that mean specifically? What are the regulations and how will they be implemented and monitored and enforced here? Are there regulations the village have increased, or waived? Why?
How will residents near a marijuana store have their concerns addressed? If it is at the old TitleMax location, will the village put in a cul-de-sac, as the residents on Berkeley have requested? Be specific.
The proponents of marijuana sales explain that it is for revenue. How much revenue? How is that calculated? How will accounting happen in a cash only business? Would there be tax breaks for the store? What will the revenue to go, and how will increased policing be offset? Given that drunk driving is a big concern, how will drugged driving be addressed? How will the village ensure that is stays out of the hands of kids?
The Riverside trustees really do need to ensure that the community concerns are addressed thoroughly, or this will continue to cause anger and frustration.
Thanks for turning to Riverside Brookfield Landmark and RBLandmark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?
On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.
No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.
Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.
Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.
I agree with trustee Hannon on his concern for architecturally...
By Dan Moon
Posted: February 13th, 2020 2:44 PM
On: Some not sold on wood panels for...
Our family realizes the importance of camp in a child's growth...
By Lonnie Lorenz
Posted: February 13th, 2020 7:05 AM
On: Summer Camp Guide 2020
Be careful what you wish for. I know you don't want...
By Jonathan Behenna
Posted: February 12th, 2020 5:09 PM
On: Riverside moves to limit Berkeley...
Is this the same Gus that ran the grocery on 100 south block of...
By Alan Majeski
Posted: February 12th, 2020 4:25 PM
On: Xelva Mayan Kitchen shutters after...
Great tribute to a wonderful man. He is already missed.
By Bob Jakoubek
Posted: February 11th, 2020 4:25 PM
On: Don Farnham, 'father of...
This desperate town will approve anything and anybody that wants...
By Fred Mertz
Posted: February 8th, 2020 6:27 AM
On: Planning group backs Ogden Ave....
View All Comments